Skip to content
Cover: a middle-aged man in a bright consultation room

Stem cells and erectile dysfunction: what the Urology journal data show

Abdominal fat cells and penile vascular repair

Quick answer

Most erectile dysfunction is vascular in origin: when penile vessels lose elasticity, blood escapes and erection cannot be sustained. The approach EHL Bio cites injects the patient's own abdominal fat-derived mesenchymal stem cells into the corpus cavernosum. The referenced study (Urology 2018;121:203.e6-203.e13) reported that six months after a single injection, participants' IIEF scores rose from about 6 to about 12 — moving from severe to mild-moderate dysfunction.

Key facts

Cell source
Patient's abdominal fat
Injection site
Corpus cavernosum
Reported IIEF change
~6 → ~12 at 6 months
Reference
Urology 2018;121:203.e6-203.e13
Work-up first
Diabetes, hormones, vascular, medications

The IIEF score and how to read the study

The IIEF (International Index of Erectile Function) is a validated scale where 5-7 is severe, 12-16 mild-to-moderate and 22-25 normal. A move from 6 to 12 is meaningful improvement, but still short of normal function.

Uncultured adipose-derived cells

Notably, that study used cells selected from fat without culture expansion, given as a single injection in a small participant group — so the results warrant caution pending larger confirmation.

Rule out the underlying causes first

Before considering cell therapy, work up the underlying causes: diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, low testosterone, sleep apnoea, medication side effects and stress or depression. Many cases improve once the root cause is addressed.

Treatments already backed by evidence

Established options include PDE5 inhibitors, lifestyle change, exercise, and in selected cases low-intensity shockwave therapy or penile implant surgery. Work through these before pursuing investigational routes.

Frequently asked questions

  • Is one injection enough?

    The cited study used a single injection with 12-month follow-up, but the sample was small, so it cannot be treated as a standard.

  • How does it compare with shockwave therapy?

    Shockwave stimulates vessel formation without surgery or cell harvesting, has more clinical data and costs less, so it is usually considered first.

  • Is it suitable for diabetic patients?

    Diabetes is a common cause; good glucose control beforehand is the most important precondition whichever route is chosen.

  • How safe is it?

    Main risks are bleeding, bruising and injection-site infection, with limited long-term data, so it should be done in a facility with urologist oversight.

Share this page

Last updated: 2026-08-28 · This content is for information only and is not medical advice. Consult a qualified doctor before making treatment decisions.

Back to categories

Related topics: Men's health

See all in this category